This group does not have any discussions yet.
Comment
Comment by Tatomir Toroman on September 29, 2012 at 9:25pm Reading a lot of media related articles I'm surprised how little is Baudrillard relevant for media anthropology? Why? I'm really interested in what he would say about Facebook... anyway, greetings to all :-)
Comment by John McCreery on May 29, 2011 at 6:12pm
Comment by Tatomir Toroman on May 29, 2011 at 12:26pm
Comment by John McCreery on May 28, 2011 at 9:22pm 
Comment by Francine Barone on May 27, 2011 at 7:38pm
Comment by Tatomir Toroman on May 27, 2011 at 6:15pm Maybe we need scandalous photos and the latest gossip about celebrities? :-)So, maybe people think that this is an area that belongs to and which is already well developed in Media Studies, Cultural Studies and Sociology. And for most of us media are there all the time, they are part of everyday life. Where is the field for fieldwork? Watch TV? Surfing the Internet? Share photos with Iphone? Hang out with reporters in a bar?

Comment by Francine Barone on May 26, 2011 at 4:12pm
Comment by Tatomir Toroman on May 25, 2011 at 11:00am Only 0.28% of the OAC members (14 of 4936) have interest in media anthropology?
What do you think why? Is this topic really that boring?
© 2013 Created by Keith Hart.
Powered by

You need to be a member of Anthropology of (Mass) Media to add comments!