40 members
93 members
54 members
15 members
214 members
Started this discussion. Last reply by John McCreery 11 hours ago.
Started this discussion. Last reply by Francine Barone Apr 10.
Jesko Schmoller joined Keith Hart's group
Anastasia Piliavsky left a comment for Keith Hart
John McCreery replied to Keith Hart's discussion Does the OAC need a new social model?
Abraham Heinemann replied to Keith Hart's discussion Does the OAC need a new social model?
Alessandro De Cola joined Keith Hart's group
Will Reichard replied to Keith Hart's discussion Does the OAC need a new social model?I am coming round to a view of anthropology as a mixture of late Durkheim and Jung. It's why what the others call ethnography is not what we do and what anthropologists do is to some extent occult, so we hide it like a dirty secret when it is in fact the source of why we get it right more often. How do we turn the bits of concrete fieldwork, the individuals and events, into a partial vision of the whole society we study? By immersing ourselves in the social life and conversations of a place…
ContinuePosted on April 14, 2012 at 7:30pm — 15 Comments
Two members of the University of Witwatersrand African Centre for Migration and Society asked how foreign migrants to South Africa cope with hostility sometimes amounting to xenophobia. In this short version of a longer journal article, they come up with the answer -- tactical cosmopolitanism -- and offer a list of its characteristics. As I read this and…
ContinuePosted on November 28, 2011 at 2:00pm — 2 Comments
Over on nettime-l, a list for those who once thought "tactical media" was the way forward, the old question of men and machines has been revived with due acknowledgment to Marshall McLuhan. One contributor exclaimed that "of course the machines won" and another said this was "simplistic Luddite rubbish". This was my response.
I can't speak for Mark Stahlman, but I don't imagine that anyone who can write so interestingly…
ContinuePosted on October 18, 2011 at 9:00am — 5 Comments
Posted on December 28, 2010 at 3:00pm — 4 Comments
Posted on November 18, 2010 at 2:00pm — 2 Comments
Added by Keith Hart
© 2012 Created by Keith Hart.
Powered by
.

Comment Wall (608 comments)
You need to be a member of Open Anthropology Cooperative to add comments!
Join Open Anthropology Cooperative
Indeed! One day this will have to be in person.
Thank you for adding me!
Thank you Keith for sharing that article. Really helpful for me. It's truly one of the central debates behind economic anthropology, although, I've been told that many anthropologists side with the substantivists, which does make sense in consideration of the discipline's aims. However, I think that it's interesting to think about that debate in relation to a lot of recent ethnographies of finance...are they taking a substantivist or formalist approach or neither? I guess it sort of makes the idea null? Or perhaps that's just a random idea. Thank you for sharing, I will definitely take a look at it. And revision is chaotic, but I am making my way through as best I can.
Thank you Keith! It looks great!
Keith,
Thanks very much for your email. It has indeed been a long time, in a galaxy far, far away. Afraid I'm just an old-fashioned guy (or, well, just old) when it comes to blogs, tweets, and Facebook friends -- I've barely come to terms with the idea of email. It's so disconcertingly quick. The Open Anthro Coop seems a good idea; I'm just not sure about being quite that public and "open." I do like to tend my little patch of brambles on the Web, at www.peripheralstudies.org , where I've downloaded much of my ravings.
Hope this direct email gets to you; don't really understand the mechanism of adding and responding to Comments on the Coop page.
Best regards,
Lee
View All Comments